Skip to main content

Open Pedagogy

In his blog post, What is Open Pedagogy, David Wiley claims that "there are much bigger victories to be won with openness" than cost savings alone. He goes on to compare using OER as a direct replacement for traditional textbooks to driving an airplane as one would a car. (Wiley) His point is that open educational resources enable a type of pedagogy prohibited by traditional textbooks and their accompanying teaching techniques. Related to cost savings is the digital nature of OER and that they can be distributed without the overhead costs associated with printing and shipping physical resources. Open educational resources have the potential to reach students, hobbyists, even professionals who might not be affiliated with an academic institution.  These and those to follow are considerations to be made in the process of adopting open educational resources.  OER enables innovative pedagogy beyond cost savings.

Open pedagogy gives students the opportunity to demonstrate learning in ways that contribute to the intellectual commons and in ways that have the potential to serve them in the future. Examples of open pedagogy might take the form of contributing to Wikipedia, creating an anthology and writing textbook chapters.  Lab exercises might be opened up by asking students to keep electronic notes and hosting them on the web such that they might be returned to in the future or by others for reference.  For classes that are taught time and time again, instructors might need to remain creative such that students do not duplicate the work done by those who have come before them. The point is that assignments should not be disposable or exercises for the sake of exercise. Students are capable, budding professionals and as such they should be given assignments they are proud to have seen by others. Giving students meaningful assignments that are showcased in platforms that make students' work potentially visible to future employers, graduate school admissions officers and others gives meaning to a students' work and might encourage them to take seriously what they otherwise might have viewed as "going through the motions."

Wiley, David. “Open Pedagogy.” Opencontent.org, 19 Nov. 2017, opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Introduction to OER

The term "Open Educational Resources" or OER describe educational materials that include but are not limited to textbooks, videos, quizzes, articles, and websites that provide others the permission to exercise the "five Rs" of the Open Content Definition put forth by David Wiley. The five Rs themselves are ways in which OER can be used that separate them from traditional educational resources. The most trivial argument to be made in favor or OER is that they are free of cost. -freely accessible to everyone; all students and instructors regardless of geography. Retain - the right to make, own, and control copies of the content (e.g., download, duplicate, store, and manage) Reuse - the right to use the content in a wide range of ways (e.g., in a class, in a study group, on a website, in a video) Revise - the right to adapt, adjust, modify, or alter the content itself (e.g., translate the content into another language) Remix - the right to combine the original or rev...
1 comment
Read more

OER Skepticism

What follows are two questions from and two potential responses to someone who is skeptical about adopting and open educational resource. Anyone could have posted that information online. This question surprises me. I understand it as a reflex, but not as an argument that anyone would defend. It's true that OER can be written and published by anyone; however, it is also true that faculty members are experts in their domains and are ultimately responsible for ensuring that the information presented to their students is appropriate and factual. Regardless of an author's academic status or lack thereof their work has the potential to be useful; however, that's up to individual instructors to decide. Adopting OER requires effort on the part of instructors as it would if they were adopting a traditional textbook -perhaps more in order to tailor the OER to their class or make it more thorough. In exchange for their effort, students taking that class forevermore will not have t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Successful OER Model

As we read about in this week's readings and as many have reiterated in the discussion, one of the most difficult things to overcome when implementing OER initiatives is awareness of what OER are and instilling the confidence in instructors and departments that OER is a viable, sustainable, model with longevity. During the outset of an OER initiative I think that it is important to target instructors who might have been using OER (they might not be calling it OER) before the initiative was put in place. These are low-hanging-fruit. They might be rogue in that this individual "OER" pursuit does not have the explicit support of their department or college, therefore any support or encouragement at all from libraries or otherwise will likely go a long way towards their continued use of OER. Because these adopters will be distributed widely across campus, there will likely be no coherency across their efforts and supporting them will be difficult at scale. This early stage ...
Post a Comment
Read more